Richmond District Democratic Club–Endorsements for June 3, 2008 Election

March 28th, 2008

U.S. Representative–CD 8

Nancy Pelosi

Member of State Assembly–AD 12

Fiona Ma

Superior Court Judge–Seat 12

Gerardo C. Sandoval

San Francisco Propositions

YES A — School Parcel Tax

YES B — Fiscal Reform of Retiree Health Care

YES C — Forfeiture of Retiree Benefits for Certain Crimes

YES D — Diversity on Boards and Commissions

NP* E — Appointments to Public Utilities Commission

NO F — Bayview Development Plan (Daly)

YES G — Bayview Development Plan (Lennar)

NP* H — Campaign Finance Reform for Certain Committees

(NP = No position)

California State Propositions

NO 98 — Government Acquisition, Regulation of Private Property

YES 99 — Eminent Domain, Acquisition of Owner-Occupied Residence

Democratic County Central Committee –12th AD

Michael Bornstein

Emily Drennen

Hene Kelly

Eric Mar

Jake McGoldrick

Jane Morrison

Melanie Nutter

Connie O’Connor

Arlo Hale Smith

David Wong

Wallenberg Democratic Club to Host Democratic Presidential Candidate Forum

January 17th, 2008

Join a coalition of San Francisco’s Democratic Clubs and elected officials for a lively discussion with surrogates representing each candidate. Just days before the California Primary, this forum stands to be a seminal event in determining who gets California Democrats’ coveted delegates.

Monday, January 28th

7:00 to 8:30

San Francisco Jewish Community Center

3200 California Street

Kanbar Hall

Moderator: John Rothmann, KGO Radio

Confirmed Surrogates:

Senator Hillary Clinton
Dennis Herrera, San Francisco City Attorney

Senator John Edwards
Betty Yee, State Board of Equalization Member

Senator Mike Gravel
Lynn Moiser, Daughter of Senator Gravel

Congressman Dennis Kucinich
Tom Gallagher, Former Massachusetts State Legislator

Senator Barack Obama
Jonathan Spalter, Former Clinton/Gore Foreign Policy Advisor

Followed by Dessert Reception and Club and Candidate Tabling

Free and Open to the Public

Co-Sponsored by:

African American Democratic Club, Alice B. Toklas Democratic Club, Bernal Heights Democratic Club, Central City Democrats, Democratic Women in Action, Democratic Women’s Forum, District Three Democratic Club, Richmond District Democratic Club, SF Young Democrats, Sunset Democratic Club, San Francisco Democratic County Central Committee,12th AD Democratic Club

Richmond District Democratic Club–Endorsements for February 5, 2008 Election

December 10th, 2007

San Francisco Propositions

A–Clean and Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond Yes

B–New Deferred Retirement Option for SFPD Yes

C–Adopting Policy to Acquire Alcatraz Island
to Make it a Global Peace Center No

California State Propositions

92–Community Colleges. Funding Yes

93–Limits on Legislators’ Terms in Office Yes

94–Referendum Petition to Overturn Amendment
to Indian Gaming Compact No

95–Referendum Petition to Overturn Amendment
to Indian Gaming Compact No

96–Referendum Petition to Overturn Amendment
to Indian No

97–Referendum Petition to Overturn Amendment
to Indian Gaming Compact Gaming Compact No

Letter Concerning Resolution on Chinese Garden in Golden Gate Park

November 14th, 2007

After discussing a proposed gift from our sister city, Shanghai, of a walled Chinese garden to be constructed on a five-acre site in Golden Gate Park, the Richmond District Democratic Club passed a resolution (see below) urging a full public review and debate of this proposal before there is any further planning or financing for it at the Golden Gate Park site.

At the RDDC meeting on September 27, members discussed what little was known at the time about the proposal and were concerned that there had been no public review. While members agreed that the proposed garden would be a beautiful and generous gift, as it would be modeled on a garden in Shanghai and would have a pavilion, waterfalls, lakes, and other structures, they raised a number of issues. Foremost among these were the lack of public process, preservation of open space, and contravention of the master plan for Golden Gate Park, which states that “new cultural buildings should be located outside existing parks… additional structures would disrupt the balance that is present between open space and special uses requiring buildings.”

Since the September 27 meeting, the Richmond Review has featured this issue in its November edition (go to www.sfrichmondreview.com to read the article once it is posted). In the article, James Fang, Chair of the Shanghai Sister City Committee, laments the fact that the proposed gift is being discussed prematurely, as it is in the early planning phase, and that the public response has been based on inaccurate information. For example, he is quoted as saying that the proposed size of the project is less than two acres, not the five acres stated in earlier media reports. This would appear to be an argument in favor of a more open public process.

My personal opinion is that the Mayor should take the lead on this project and hold public meetings at which the size and scope of the garden, its financing and on-going maintenance costs, and, most importantly, its location are discussed before we are presented with a fait accompli and the usual public wrangle that would follow and would embarrass both sister cities, when in fact Shanghai has proposed a beautiful and very generous gift.

Susan Hall

RDDC Board Member

Resolution on Proposed Walled Chinese Garden in Golden Gate Park

November 14th, 2007

Richmond District Democratic Club Resolution Regarding Proposed Gift of Chinese Walled Garden in Golden Gate Park

WHEREAS, the gift of a walled Chinese garden with a pavilion, waterfalls, lakes, and other structures is being proposed by the SF-Shanghai Sister City Committee to be located in San Francisco, and the five acres selected for this project are to be in Golden Gate Park adjacent to Spreckels Lake between 31st and 33rd Avenues; and

WHEREAS, the choice of the location for this gift has not had the benefit of a public process, nor has there been open discussion of other possible sites, and there is concern that preserving the open space in our parks has not been observed, as is clearly defined in the City’s General Plan; and

WHEREAS, there is also concern regarding the precedent-setting nature of using park lands to accommodate possible gifts from our other 13 sister cities in San Francisco*;

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that, while we are excited by the prospect of having such a garden in San Francisco, the Richmond District Democratic Club urges a full public review and debate of this proposal before there is any further planning or financing for it at the Golden Gate Park site.

*Other Sister Cities:

Abijan, Ivory Coast

Assissi, Italy

Cork, Ireland

Haifa, Israel

Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam

Manila, Philippines

Osaka, Japan

Paris, France

Seoul, Korea

Sydney, Australia

Taipei, Taiwan

Thessaloniki, Greece

Zurich, Switzerland

Resolution Adopted by the Richmond District Democratic Club at its General Membership Meeting on September 27, 2007.